PDA

View Full Version : 137



Aianawa
23rd March 2017, 02:01
A nice mystery indeed > http://www.fotuva.org/online/frameload.htm?/online/137.htm

There is a big picture here I feel, 137 that is, another piece > http://thehereticmagazine.com/the-sator-square/

Aianawa
23rd March 2017, 02:13
As we saw/see here in another thread > https://jandeane81.com/showthread.php/8477-Introducing-Raphael < 137 has been investigated a long time but also used a very long time > https://kachina2012.wordpress.com/2011/12/15/the-sacred-cut-by-tons-brunes/ < hence its looking into by the finest minds and brains from way back to now.

Aianawa
23rd March 2017, 08:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ik3UvcTgm4

Myst
24th March 2017, 01:58
.

Aianawa
26th March 2017, 21:52
Nice, I remember thinking, mmm I wonder what energy it is on the dreamspell, 137, was/is Red Resonate Earth = a balanced Earth.

Aianawa
27th March 2017, 08:40
Bit more > http://kabbalahstudent.com/the-magic-of-137/

> http://www.integralworld.net/piacenza4.html

> https://cosmosmagazine.com/mathematics/number-fascinates-physicists-above-all-others

Dreamtimer
27th March 2017, 12:37
And to think, this whole time I thought the answer to everything was 42!

This is good stuff, Aianawa. Thanks for sharing.

Dreamtimer
27th March 2017, 13:19
We have alpha and phi, pyramids and tetrahedrons, and toruses. The Great Geometer indeed.

Dreamtimer
27th March 2017, 14:06
I thought this bit was interesting:

"A few years ago a new slant on this old problem emerged. John Webb and his colleagues at the University of New South Wales carried out an intensive study of the fine structure in the spectral lines of extremely distant astronomical objects. The data analysed by Webb provides a way to measure the value of alpha billions of light years away and, because of the finite speed of light, billions of years ago.

What they found threatens to turn the world of theoretical physics upside down. On the face of it, alpha has slightly different values in different parts of the Universe, implying that the fine structure constant is not a constant at all, but varies over cosmological distances and times."

From the Cosmos article.

Dreamtimer
27th March 2017, 14:14
From "The Mystery of 137":

"We know that the number is required to know how specific wavelengths of light interact in precise ways with atoms and how electromagnetic forces hold atoms together. Hence we know that this number is one of the core factors that determine the size of the atoms and, therefore, the form and structure of the Universe."

Anyone know how this relates to the double slit experiment?

How constant are our constants?

Shadowself
27th March 2017, 14:30
My friend SA did a follow up post to one I posted on green laser over three years ago and I remembered and found it thus:

http://i45.tinypic.com/25in3p0.jpg


1 Became 3 Became 7 Became Many - as WE Explored Both the (-) and the (+) in a Spiraling, Diverging way.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1oaXqBJRRQ

The post of days gone by...

http://www.themistsofavalon.net/t112p435-phaseshift#95392

Just thought the 137 reference was interesting and had a place here.

Have a great day!

SiriArc
27th March 2017, 16:20
Tβ3


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mk9MWei8MI

Notching and A Secret of Spirituality
http://forum.noblerealms.org/viewtopic.php?id=2139

Shadowself
27th March 2017, 17:01
Dude!

So glad to see you here! I had no idea!

I was just thinking about you this weekend. Remember the color wheel and Pink unto thee? The Rose (pink) colored vortex and the throne archetype amidst purple waterfalls and such?

Check it:

Pink in the color wheel

It seems to be a PhaseShift unto thee


(and not necessarily off topic to the thread as the Feynman post and Bohr Model: where innermost electron of an atom with Z = 137 would be orbiting (just below) the speed of light, and the next element (Z = 138) would be "impossible").

137:

Tis also the 33rd prime which comes full circle in another holistic term I was studying back in the day.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9dqJRyk0YM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnHbDQkvXxw

Whoa dude!

As always great to see you and as usual I'm off to work

Myst
28th March 2017, 02:38
.

Shadowself
28th March 2017, 06:05
And to think, this whole time I thought the answer to everything was 42!

This is good stuff, Aianawa. Thanks for sharing.

Check it out...Trippy Trivia



137 divided by 42 = 3.26


3.26 ~ Parsec

What is a Parsec?

The parsec (symbol: pc) is a unit of length used to measure large distances to objects outside the Solar System.

One parsec is the distance at which one astronomical unit subtends an angle of one arcsecond.

A parsec is equal to about 3.26 light-years


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1up3thBSPc

In 2012: 'Super-Earth' exoplanet spotted 42 light-years away

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-20249753


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcy8o0gj-A0

Dreamtimer
28th March 2017, 11:14
I'm so glad you commented on this, Shadowself. I couldn't recall if you had touched on 137 in your six degrees thread. It sure had some fascinating stuff on numbers. I used to be good at math...decades ago.:whstl:

Shadowself
28th March 2017, 15:23
I'm so glad you commented on this, Shadowself. I couldn't recall if you had touched on 137 in your six degrees thread. It sure had some fascinating stuff on numbers. I used to be good at math...decades ago.:whstl:

No I had not touched on 137 in that thread. Last night when I made the last post here on the 42 trippy trivia connect I was crunching some of those number and I somehow interestingly ran into one of the Fibonacci primes....but when I went back to check it I stupidly forgot how I arrived at it. It got me going so far as it kept me up till 4:30 AM and I could not reproduce it again! ARGH!!!! But somehow it was arrived at from 42!

I don't know what formula I used to get to it but that number was 233....anybody up for the task? LOL I didn't get much sleep for my upcoming work day and perhaps later will try again to see how I arrived at it...but here it is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/233_(number)


And coincidentally...233 is a Sophie Germain prime.... Sophie Germain primes and safe primes have applications in public key cryptography...which if you'll recall was what I was searching for in the tomb I was studying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Germain_prime

Of which ... The first few Sophie Germain primes are: 2, 3, 5, 11, 23, 29, 41, 53, 83, 89, 113, 131, 173, 179, 191, 233, 239, 251, 281, 293, 359, 419, 431, 443, 491, 509, 593, 641, 653, 659, 683, 719, 743, 761, 809, 911, 953, ...

And coincidentally...

131 plus 6[degrees of separation] = 137

But again I don't know how I arrived at 233. This of course occurred after an 8 hour shift and I was rather tired.

Dreamtimer
28th March 2017, 16:56
Maybe it'll come back in a dream.;)

Aianawa
4th April 2017, 01:15
Also 1 + 3 = 4 the then centre of 7.

Dreamtimer
8th May 2017, 21:22
I came across an interesting piece of reading called The Crystal by Mark Cocking (http://markcocking.com/index.php/writings/the-crystal-2/).

Here's an excerpt:


After giving up any hope of seeing through all this confusion, the child made his way to the next lesson. This was Physics, and he hated it because the teacher always seemed unable to answer questions, like ‘Why’ or ‘What if?’ This lesson was, however, a bit different. The teacher was talking about the BIG BANG, which is how the Universe began, according to current science. He explained that modern technology had proven that the BIG BANG happened some 13.7 Billion years ago.

He noted the numbers 1, 3, &7 and the fact that science itself had already noted them.

137 is the strangest number in mainstream science. It crops up in many calculations and answers, yet they know not why.

Scientists had measured a level of ‘background’ radiation in the sky. The presence of this background radiation is taken to prove that there was a huge fireball at the beginning of the Universe, and that it has now cooled down to the temperature recorded by the COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer) satellite. They calculated the temperatures that must have been involved and extrapolated back in time to calculate that the background radiation temperature is currently what it would be after cooling down for 13.7 billion years. The child failed to see the logic in their assumption but then realised that it was a reasonable one to make. But only if one is unaware of the underlying geometry in simple observations.


Surrounding this bit is discussion of the number 2.732:


The latest measurements taken by the Hubble space telescope show a reading of 2.734 degrees KELVIN. The child thought this interesting. So he asked the teacher how accurate the reading was!? The teacher, of course, didn’t know. All he could say was that it was at first 2.735 but further measurement has brought this down.

He asked the teacher, “what if it is found to be 2.732?”

The teacher had no idea what the child meant, and it dawned on the child that he had no real idea what he meant either, but he pressed the point.

”Sir, if it is 2.732 then I can show you that this number appears in many relationships on Earth and the Moon (but only in Decimal base 10) and, if this proves to be the case, then that temperature cannot be the remnants of a Big Bang explosion. On the contrary, it must be some sort of universal constant itself. Is it a coincidence, for example, that a gas expands by a factor of 1.2732 for every degree it is heated?

You might enjoy the whole piece that I linked to.

I might start a thread on this guy. He worked in banking, became a druid which he says is at the heart of it all, and has observed those 'on top' and has discussed how they control the masses through their occult knowledge.

Amanda
9th May 2017, 01:57
I recall reading an article where Nikola Tesla stated the following; When you understand the numbers 3 and 6 and 9, you will understand the Universe. I've come to appreciate mathematics late in life and I know that many answers are found therein ....

Now I have 137 to ponder. Thank You.

Much Respect - Amanda

Dreamtimer
9th May 2017, 11:41
Cocking talks about 3, 6, and 9. He still does presentations and I'm watching/listening to a couple. I think I'll start sharing some of his stuff in a thread once I'm done with this phase. It's really fascinating. I've never really looked into what people call sacred geometry but I'm beginning to understand the 'truth' of that name.

Amanda
9th May 2017, 23:54
Dreamtimer - I refer to Sacred Geometry all the time. I have friends who are science based in their education and profession and they refer to Geometry. I think I prefer the title Sacred Geometry due to the sense of learning about all that has been omitted from regular curricula and mainstream learning.

I shall be returning to this thread so that I can keep learning. My understanding is that Fractals and the Mandelbrot Set are based on numbers and Sacred Geometry. I swear if all these subjects were included in the regular school curricula - Students would be turning up to school in any condition rather that dragging themselves to school. I know for a fact Students want to study all aspects of all subjects. I will stop rambling now.

Thanks to everyone for providing me with ample homework.

Much Respect - Amanda

Dreamtimer
10th May 2017, 11:55
Speaking of fractals, did you know you can randomly create a Sierpinski triangle? It would take a long time to do it by hand but all you'd need is paper, pen, ruler and a D6. (six sided die)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=droTYSmSGHg

Aianawa
12th May 2017, 07:47
Long game lol.

137 = 11 the mastery + 7 X 3 = 21 + 1 = 22 = dual mastery.

Dreamtimer
23rd May 2017, 03:07
Here's some more on 137 (http://www.secretsinplainsight.com/2015/12/08/why-137/).


The great psychotherapist Carl Jung helped Pauli in his quest to find a mathematical basis for the fine structure constant by interpreting more than 400 of Pauli’s dreams, published in Jung’s Psychology and Alchemy. Jung believed that Pauli unconsciously comprehended “some grand cosmic order.” Arthur Miller wrote a book about their collaboration entitled, 137: Jung, Pauli, and the Pursuit of a Scientific Obsession.

Aianawa
10th June 2017, 05:55
Also 1 + 2 is between 1 and 3, then 3 + 4 is between 3 and 7, therefore, 2 more added again is, 7 + 6 = 13.

7 being the exact middle of 13

Dumpster Diver
21st March 2018, 12:17
Bumping this important thread. :bump2:

Dreamtimer
21st March 2018, 12:22
137 came up in the Twyman article I linked to in the Kryon thread (https://jandeane81.com/showthread.php/12050-Peeling-the-onion-of-reality) Aianawa started. Related to the origins of playing cards, chess, and the Templars, the dates were 1307 and 1377.

Aianawa
26th March 2018, 22:07
I let the 137 mystery go, finally, some time ago, still ponder and wonder, knowing it arkeytypally dreamspell wise, was 137 = resonate Earth, sounded good enough for me lol.

Dreamtimer
26th March 2018, 23:10
Yeah. When I saw your link to this (https://timesurfers.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/resonant-moon-21-st-john-and-the-7777/) and I saw the 137, I almost posted it here.

But of course, you already knew about it and had already linked to it. :cool::meditating:

Emil El Zapato
26th March 2018, 23:29
A nice mystery indeed > http://www.fotuva.org/online/frameload.htm?/online/137.htm

There is a big picture here I feel, 137 that is, another piece > http://thehereticmagazine.com/the-sator-square/

That's a tough one to crack, Aianawa...to come up with a credible response is going to require some research, perhaps a book or two. Busy this evening but I'm accepting the challenge... :)

Initial thoughts are that trying to solve a mystery like this might drive one mad.

The guy that cracked Fermat's Last Theorem spent years in his room working on it. And when interviewed later about his accomplishment unabashedly cried like a baby ... no sheeiiittt! :)


This is the best thing I've seen since the Higg's Boson...

Emil El Zapato
26th March 2018, 23:37
Cocking talks about 3, 6, and 9. He still does presentations and I'm watching/listening to a couple. I think I'll start sharing some of his stuff in a thread once I'm done with this phase. It's really fascinating. I've never really looked into what people call sacred geometry but I'm beginning to understand the 'truth' of that name.

I can 'conjecture' on this one immediately... lol, yeah that's a joke but anyway.

Forget 6 and 9...Understand the number 3 and you're there... :)

enjoy being
27th March 2018, 02:08
1 3 7
3 9 21
9 27 63
27 81 189
81 243 567
243 729 1701
729 2187 5103
2187 6561 15309
6561 19183 45927
19183 57549 137781

To think people have spent many decades muttering and scribbling numbers down, looking for patterns.
I guess it could be quite addictive when you don't know about the internet.

Aianawa
27th March 2018, 02:19
See your last number 137781 can be , 137 and 7x7=49=13 plus 9x9 nine being completion and in this case by itself 9 = 81 = 9.

From memory, the fellow most into this last century actually died in a hotel, room number yip 137




That's a tough one to crack, Aianawa...to come up with a credible response is going to require some research, perhaps a book or two. Busy this evening but I'm accepting the challenge... :)

Initial thoughts are that trying to solve a mystery like this might drive one mad.

The guy that cracked Fermat's Last Theorem spent years in his room working on it. And when interviewed later about his accomplishment unabashedly cried like a baby ... no sheeiiittt! :)


This is the best thing I've seen since the Higg's Boson...

Aragorn
27th March 2018, 02:35
See your last number 137781 can be , 137 and 7x7=49=13 plus 9x9 nine being completion and in this case by itself 9 = 81 = 9.

From memory, the fellow most into this last century actually died in a hotel, room number yip 137

If you're referring to Nikola Tesla, then I'm going to have to correct you, because the hotel room he lived in until his death was room 3327. :p

He demanded that all rooms he'd stay in would have a number divisible by 3. 137 is a prime number, so that would never have worked for him. ;)

Aianawa
27th March 2018, 03:02
Sure it was not Tesla, will look into memory banks.

Dreamtimer
27th March 2018, 12:52
Here's some of what Twyman wrote about magic squares.


That the chessboard is a beautifully complex matrix of interacting elements has not escaped the notice of mathematicians throughout the centuries. Scores of books have been written about the numerous “magic squares” that can be created on an 8 x 8 chessboard. Magic squares are matrices filled with numbers, in which all of the rows and columns add up to the same sum. They can also be made out of the letters of any alphabet, or in fact any set of symbols that one would want to use. People have discovered thousands of magic squares that can be placed on the chessboard, creating all sort of amazing numerical patterns, which can then be transformed into colors, pictures, or musical notes. You can even make magic squares on the chessboard using the I-Ching hexagrams, the geomancy patterns, the 32 Hebrew “paths,” and the DNA codons. Magic squares are considered genuinely magical in the occult, believed to represent planetary intelligences, and were thought to bring wealth or cure diseases in medieval times. For instance, many occult novices are familiar with the so-called “Templar magic square,” which is actually as old as civilization. In Latin, the letters read:

SATOR
AREPO
TENET
OPERA
ROTAS
Interestingly, the magic square attributed to the intelligence of Mercury is an 8 x 8 matrix.


But by far the most famous 8 x 8 magical squares are those associated with the Knight’s Tour. This is the name of a puzzle of interest to both chess players and mathematicians alike. The aim is for the knight to visit each and every square on the chessboard once, and only once, using the L-shaped knight’s move. There are thousands of solutions on the 8 x 8 chessboard. Knight’s Tours can also be displayed on a number of other platforms, including larger or smaller boards, and even three-dimensional objects like cubes, tubes, and cylinders. (There are tours for rooks and kings as well, yielding different results.) They are classified as either “open” or “re-entrant,” depending on whether or not the knight ends up on the same square from which it started. (The re-entrant tours are considered the most “elegant.”) Numerous magic squares (as well as cubes and cylinders) can be created by numbering the squares that the knight visits in chronological order to create an array. Drawing lines to connect these squares in order can create beautiful web-like patterns. One, discovered by Edward Falkber, yields a pattern at its center resembling a stylized swastika. And many of the most fascinating Knight’s Tour magic squares (including “supermagical” squares that form magical multiplication tables as well) yield sums that are always multiples of thirteen, the most famous of which is a supermagical square discovered by Benjamin Franklin.

http://quintessentialpublications.com/twyman/wp-content/uploads/faulkner2-300x295.jpg

Dumpster Diver
27th March 2018, 14:16
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-pHjsCm4kz08/TXWXbzel0JI/AAAAAAAAANs/e5wPTyjFO4k/s1600/7x7_TR_5-12-13.png

From:

http://the-magic-square.blogspot.com/2011/03/this-is-fantastic-magic-square-and.html

Emil El Zapato
27th March 2018, 14:59
Here's one for normal people ... :)

http://www.coolmath-games.com/0-bloxorz

Dumpster Diver
27th March 2018, 16:06
7 out of 5 people are math challenged...

Aianawa
28th March 2018, 03:20
Gee that made me chuckle lol,

Dreamtimer
28th March 2018, 12:34
Three out of one people are a trinity.

Emil El Zapato
28th March 2018, 12:52
Three out of one people are a trinity.

So saith the Creator and the Cosmos - Aragornese :)

Dumpster Diver
29th March 2018, 17:39
Three out of one people are a trinity.

I like this!

Dreamtimer
30th March 2018, 13:02
Thanks. It was off-the-cuff and then seemed actually meaningful. ;)

Aragorn
30th March 2018, 17:55
Hmm... I've just finished a game of patience, and it ended in 137 moves. :hmm:


7 out of 5 people are math challenged...

There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't. :p

Dreamtimer
30th March 2018, 20:07
Hmm... I've just finished a game of patience, and it ended in 137 moves.

For real? Nice synchrocoinkydink.;)

Aragorn
31st March 2018, 06:00
Hmm... I've just finished a game of patience, and it ended in 137 moves. :hmm:

For real? Nice synchrocoinkydink.;)

Yes, for real. It made me think of this thread, and so I wanted to post the eggysample here. :ttr:

Dumpster Diver
31st March 2018, 09:59
Hmm... I've just finished a game of patience, and it ended in 137 moves. :hmm:



There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't. :p

You might have to explain this one to binary challenged folks, only the geeky computer math freaks like you (and me) get it.

Aragorn
31st March 2018, 10:45
Hmm... I've just finished a game of patience, and it ended in 137 moves. :hmm:

You might have to explain this one to binary challenged folks, only the geeky computer math freaks like you (and me) get it.

Okay then. :p In decimal notation, there are ten digits: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. In binary notation, there are only two usable digits: 0 and 1. So if you want to transpose a decimal number to a binary number, then you get something like this table below. ;)





Decimal

Binary



0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...

0
1
10
11
100
101
110
111
1000
1001
1010
1011
1100
1101
1110
1111
10000
...



This of course means that you need much longer numbers to write a decimal value in binary notation. However, the 0 and 1 in the binary system correspond to the state of the electrical switches in transistors — such as found in computer chips — whereby 0 stands for an electrical "off" state and 1 stands for an electrical "on" state. And this is how computers work. Everything is literally processed and stored by way of binary values — even alphanumeric characters, inflections and punctuation, because each alphanumeric character, each inflection character, each punctuation mark, et al, is represented by a number in a character encoding table.

Many different such character encodings exist, but the one currently most applicable for international communications is Unicode, of which the UTF-8 subset is the most commonly used one in western languages. Sadly enough, many US Americans still haven't discovered that there is intelligent life outside of the borders of the USA, and so many websites and many software packages still make use of the older ISO-8859-1 character encoding, which focuses mainly on the Latin alphabet and doesn't even contain the Euro symbol (€). Unicode on the other hand even supports bidirectional script, so that languages such as Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese and Japanese can all be properly displayed. ;)

Now, even though humans prefer decimal notation and computers exclusively operate by way of binary values, computer programmers are generally quite familiar with the hexadecimal system, which consists of sixteen digits: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, C, D, E and F. If we transpose that to decimal values, then it'll look like in the table below. ;)





Decimal

Hexadecimal



0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
...

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A
B
C
D
E
F
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1A
1B
1C
1D
1E
1F
20
21
22
...



So you see, with hexadecimal notation, it suddenly becomes possible to write down much bigger values with far fewer digits. And when it comes to dealing with computer values — e.g. color values, memory addresses or even character encodings — this is no luxury. Of course, underneath, the computer still processes everything in binary, but the hexadecimal values can be translated into binary values by the software in the exact same way as that the software accepts decimal values as input from the operator and gives him/her decimal values as output if so desired — e.g. on a pocket calculator or a digital watch. ;)

Anyway, I guess this is pretty much a digression, so let's return...


:back to topic:

Dreamtimer
31st March 2018, 15:22
Unicode and Hexadecimal. Cool. :cool::cool: I'll learn to use these in a sentence and impress my computer geek friends. One has been using linux for years, the other is the one always retreating to the game defense.

Aragorn
31st March 2018, 15:24
Unicode and Hexadecimal. Cool. :cool::cool: I'll learn to use these in a sentence and impress my computer geek friends. One has been using linux for years, the other is the one always retreating to the game defense.

You should tell the gamer about the existence of the Valve Steam engine for GNU/Linux, which supports dozens (if not hundreds) of games. In fact, Valve has even created their own dedicated GNU/Linux distribution (based upon Ubuntu) for gaming purposes. ;)

Dreamtimer
31st March 2018, 15:26
Excellent. :thup:

Dumpster Diver
31st March 2018, 15:56
Well, all you really had to say was: in binary, 10 = 2 in decimal.

But, all in all a nice write up on hex. Oh, you could have gone into binary, base 4, base 8, base 16 (hexadecimal) and how to convert between each.

...yeah, I’m the guy who built base 8, base 12, and base 16 sliderules when I was a kid.

Emil El Zapato
31st March 2018, 17:08
Well, all you really had to say was: in binary, 10 = 2 in decimal.

But, all in all a nice write up on hex. Oh, you could have gone into binary, base 4, base 8, base 16 (hexadecimal) and how to convert between each.

...yeah, I’m the guy who built base 8, base 12, and base 16 sliderules when I was a kid.

Here's a challenge for all of you:

BLOXORZ is a FUN addictive game. It has 33 stages and a publicized computer optimized solution. My daughter when in middle school introduced me to it and I couldn't stop playing it. I was determined to equal the best score possible (according to the computer solution) and after months of trying, finally beat the computer score by 1 move. Hah! Now you try it... :)


It's a simplified analog to the 4-color theorem and the other one which I can't remember but it's a mathematical theorem that demonstrates a graph theoretical closed system connected by paths to the vertices within the graph. I provided a graphical solution to that problem to the consternation of all my fellow students not to mention my psychopathic Professor. He actually stated that it was the kind of problem that could be solved without knowing anything. Yeah, he said that. I sat next to a full scholarship student (I was a drop-in) and he spent several weeks trying to solve the problem and couldn't...heh, heh, he eventually asked me for my solution and thereafter if he was having problems on tests would try to cheat off mine. Which I studiously ignored... :)

Aianawa
8th May 2018, 01:00
Have a look at the 137 references with this article if you desire, feel.
like this one , As it has been pointed out on the web, Donald John Trump K107 was 70 years 7 month and 7 days old on inauguration day – K137 Red Resonant Earth.


https://timesurfers.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/resonant-moon-21-st-john-and-the-7777/

Aianawa
8th May 2018, 23:00
The tune, if it had a number, for the music the asteroid belt/planet maldek now makes, IS 137, cool hang ten as Mars spins now on the Suns finger alls smiling