I've never paid Linda anything, but I've learned a lot of interesting information from her, through C2C and other interviews, and the free info she publishes on her website. Like in the video in the OP, she seems pretty open with details. I'm sure she doesn't always give all the details she knows, and any kind of personal interaction is a different matter with its own context and circumstances, but I've always got the sense that she's one of the "good guys" in the research field. I could be wrong but that's just the feeling I've always gotten from her.
Last edited by bsbray, 24th March 2016 at 04:29.
Reason: typo
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to bsbray For This Useful Post:
Aragorn (24th March 2016), Bob (24th March 2016), boja (24th March 2016), Chester (28th March 2016), Divine Feminine (24th March 2016), Elen (24th March 2016), jimmer (26th March 2016), Myst (24th March 2016), Olaf (1st April 2016)
I make a valid point, and I see disinfo being purposefully being stirred up over something that happened long ago. That is my opinion.
Bob stated his personal opinion on Linda Moulton Howe, and he has clarified why he has that opinion. I don't consider that disinformation. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions — he is to his and you are to yours.
Had Bob not provided clarification on why he felt that way, then there could have been reason to suspect disinfo, yes. But that was obviously not the case here, so I see no foul play.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Aragorn For This Useful Post:
Bob (24th March 2016), Chester (28th March 2016), Divine Feminine (24th March 2016), Elen (24th March 2016), gord (25th March 2016), jimmer (26th March 2016), lcam88 (24th March 2016)
I've listened to her several times myself...I have no way of knowing the accuracy of her reports though she does sound interesting. In the same token, she has no way of knowing what she's walking into when she's does these interviews. As a reporter you can't tell me she hasn't thought at times she might be getting set up.
Some added info to consider with the whole U.F.O/cattle mutilation phenomenon....
Alamosa is just under 3hours away from Colorado Springs, Co, the location of Mt. Cheyenne Complex and Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station and home to NORAD which stands for North American Aerospace Defense Command and God knows what else.......I would have cited the .mil page but it appeared to be down. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_...efense_Command
"North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD, /ˈnɔːræd/), known until March 1981 as the North American Air Defense Command, is a combined organization of the United States and Canada that provides aerospace warning, air sovereignty, and defense for Northern America.[4] Headquarters for NORAD and the NORAD/United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM) center are located at Peterson Air Force Base in El Paso County, near Colorado Springs, Colorado. The nearby Cheyenne Mountain Complex has the Alternate Command Center. The NORAD commander and deputy commander (CINCNORAD) are, respectively, a United States four-star general or equivalent and a Canadian three-star general or equivalent."
Here's what was said in a John B. Wells interview in the first few months of him opening shop back in 2014. His guest was Major Bill Donahue, Marine Corp, who identified himself as a NORAD employee working a mile deep inside Cheyenne Mountain. According to Major Donahue who worked in command center, he was 1 of 5 officers who determined if we were under nuclear attack or not.
“We saw everything that entered the atmosphere because everything that enters the atmosphere, that I’m aware of, creates a heat signature as it enters the atmosphere, and I never saw any UFO’s or anything we couldn’t identify. So, uh, while I would love to believe in UFO’s, I never saw any evidence of it while I worked at NORAD.” - Major Bill Donahue
Stated around the 1:57:00 mark FEB 2014
Additionally he commented at the time he was working there, they were able to track up to 18,000 items in orbit such as bolts and space gloves and various other space junks.
So either... 1. There really are no such things as UFO’s....OR....2. The military has already ‘identified’ them so they can technically say they are no longer classified as Unidentified Flying Objects.
Unfortunately Mr. 'Caravan to Midnight' was sleeping at the helm that night and let this one slide by not even questioning the remark or offering the poor listener proper clarification! Unbelieveable! Adding another wtf moment to my alternative media inquires.
So here we have less than 3 hours away from Alamosa Valley, the most sophisticated military ‘aerospace warning’ and defense in North America and we’re suppose to believe that we can’t figure out who’s causing all the cattle mutilations....um....ya...ok
A Strange Harvest "The existence of cattle mutilations was brought to the attention of the public by Linda Moulton Howe. Howe researched and produced a documentary called A Strange Harvest. It was the first work that connected cattle mutilations to UFOs. The documentary won an Emmy Award in 1980. Her work concluded that animal mutilations appear to emanate from two places:
1. UFOs
2. Unmarked helicopters and large vans seemingly owned by branches of the U.S. government.
Linda Moulton Howe has continued her research and adds more documentation in her follow-up book An Alien Harvest: Further Evidence Linking Animal Mutilations and Human Abductions to Alien Life Forms.
In her most recent book, Glimpses of Other Realities, Vol. II, Howe tells of discussions she had with military intelligence operatives. They told her that the mutilations were in fact being done by the aliens, who were testing the animals for high levels of toxins that we humans have put into the atmosphere. They also told her that the black helicopters were a ruse to cover up the alien involvement in mutilations. 5. They didn't want the farmers to panic. It appears to be working, because most farmers when interviewed said they thought it was the government doing some kind of secret testing.
Linda Moulton Howe is a regular contributor and can be heard live on the 'Coast to Coast' syndicated radio show hosted by Art Bell and George Noory."
But wait.......I thought U.F.O.'s didn't exist??? And the disinfo continues......
“We saw everything that entered the atmosphere because everything that enters the atmosphere, that I’m aware of, creates a heat signature as it enters the atmosphere, and I never saw any UFO’s or anything we couldn’t identify. So, uh, while I would love to believe in UFO’s, I never saw any evidence of it while I worked at NORAD.” - Major Bill Donahue
Stated around the 1:57:00 mark FEB 2014
If my memory is not failing me here, and that's a big if, Naval Commander Willard Miller can be heared sharing very interesting insider info re USAPs etc here:
And there's the story where he was in NORAD and got shown their live tracking systems. The thing is, there was a whole frikking tracking category for UFOs. When it was selected for display the system denied access, because lack of clearance.
Of course this could be at a different time to Donahue's service. Maybe those details are mentioned in the interviews too, but I have no to time to check that right now.
I've met Linda personally, to discuss cattle mutilations in the Alamosa Valley, Colorado. The interview lasted for 2 hours. A point to keep in mind, there IS an agenda with her.
Originally posted by Divine Feminine
Personally I'm more interested in knowing Bob's agenda than Linda's. The crypted message seems more agenda based in itself.
Originally posted by Aragorn
Bob stated his personal opinion on Linda Moulton Howe, and he has clarified why he has that opinion. I don't consider that disinformation. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions — he is to his and you are to yours.
Had Bob not provided clarification on why he felt that way, then there could have been reason to suspect disinfo, yes. But that was obviously not the case here, so I see no foul play.
And now...
I think its quite clear there is agenda involved with all parties here including Linda. There is no way to prove much but the gut feelings I have changed with Linda just a few years ago actually. I felt much as others that this is the woman going to change things but then she got involved in an episode and research Linda did on mutilations and during that time during one of the researches I'm quite certain someone got to her.
My guess is they took her privately like they do. They scared her enough to make her obviously more cautious now with what she will openly talk about particularly human mutilations and hybrids. I think she got close on some of the research on Dolce NM and the mutilations and I was involved in some of that in OK and we found binoc covers and things aliens don't use so its men in my opinion. I also feel bad for those that still get wide eyed over these reports coming because I'm so cautious now with these new 'BREAKTHROUGH" and galactic news reports that anymore I must confess I roll my eyes more than ever at them. I'd recommend caution with Linda M H> I think things started out honest and when she got in hot water she found out what its like to be leveraged and I feel now that any one and I mean anyone that is constantly promoted and in the public eye must be dealt with with caution. If none of these other fiasco's have taught us anything its had to teach us that much I'd think.
Forgive me for not reading every single post within this thread but I wanted to share what I learned about the person featured in the opening post. Several years ago I wrote a brief article about animal mutilations - it was published in an Australian magazine. Already knowing a little about the person mentioned - I read a couple of comments that piqued my interest in why this particular person had made some leeway into the area of Exopolitical Research.
Research led me to the Masons - her father (was) in charge of an airforce base that was known to reverse engineer. Her husband was also connected to the cabal/illuminati/whatever. I can even tell you she was a beauty queen. The point I want to make is that she has connections to all that is kept from the public and only hinted at, within mainstream media.
I have a lot more questions about why the person - who is the subject of the opening post - maintains a fairly high profile in the arena of Exopolitics. Could it be like Greer - that they are Children of those who actually do know what is being held back from the public?
Children of the cabal/illuminati/whatever can either be manipulated by their families or they can share what they know to be true. All I know is that after researching I had far more questions than answers. Please feel free to research her - all that I found was quite easy to find. Could it be a case of "in plain sight" or do the ego driven controllers of society think that we all still drink the sodium fluoride?
Much Peace - as we continue to work our way through the pain and chaos in search of answers - Amanda
They scared her enough to make her obviously more cautious now with what she will openly talk about particularly human mutilations and hybrids. I think she got close on some of the research on Dolce NM.......
Not sure how much they really scared her...in fact she' presenting at Dulce in mid May.
Originally posted by Amanda
Forgive me for not reading every single post within this thread but I wanted to share what I learned about the person featured in the opening post. Several years ago I wrote a brief article about animal mutilations - it was published in an Australian magazine. Already knowing a little about the person mentioned - I read a couple of comments that piqued my interest in why this particular person had made some leeway into the area of Exopolitical Research.
Research led me to the Masons - her father (was) in charge of an airforce base that was known to reverse engineer. Her husband was also connected to the cabal/illuminati/whatever. I can even tell you she was a beauty queen. The point I want to make is that she has connections to all that is kept from the public and only hinted at, within mainstream media.
I have a lot more questions about why the person - who is the subject of the opening post - maintains a fairly high profile in the arena of Exopolitics. Could it be like Greer - that they are Children of those who actually do know what is being held back from the public?
Children of the cabal/illuminati/whatever can either be manipulated by their families or they can share what they know to be true. All I know is that after researching I had far more questions than answers. Please feel free to research her - all that I found was quite easy to find. Could it be a case of "in plain sight" or do the ego driven controllers of society think that we all still drink the sodium fluoride?
Much Peace - as we continue to work our way through the pain and chaos in search of answers - Amanda
It always seems intriguing that more often than not, the one's who are doing the researching/revealing and/or whistle blowing usually have some connection to either Illuminati/Cabal families or CIA.
Divine Feminine and others- further to my comments I will add. Friends of mine run the UFOPRSA in Australia and several years ago Moulton-Howe was presenting at a variety of locations within Australia. I was not able to afford the travel costs and thus could not attend the presentation closest to where I live. It was relayed to me that she did seem to have access to some very interesting technology that is kept from the general public.
As much as I trust my friends and their - as it were - professional opinion. I still have a lot of questions. My concerns mainly centre on the fact that although many whistleblowers and public advocates for all subjects relating to Exopolitical Relations - why is it some die in VERY suspicious circumstances and some seem to be coated in teflon???
So... 2016 is going to be THE year of disclosure is it? Just like all the other predictions on imminent disclosure from the likes of Dr Greer, et al.
This is of course assuming there is something to disclose.
There seem to be a lot of people working to prove UFOs are ET related rather than keeping an open mind as to what the hell they actually are. There are even elements of MUFON who seem to be toiling to this end, when all we have is anecdotal evidence. While that is a good start, no quantity of anecdotal evidence amounts to proof. There is also much cherry picking of the evidence to 'confirm' the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
What makes matters worse is that reports of UFOs in the broadcast media almost always come along with the X-Files music, and that the print media always frame it with something like "Are we alone in the universe?" rather than "What undiscovered natural or physiological phenomenon may be the cause of sightings?"
While reports of UFOs continue across the globe, there is not a shred of evidence (at least in the public domain) that points to extraterrestrials. If there is any proof hidden away in some military, government or private industry vault, why would it be revealed this year and not last or next year?
Babs
Last edited by Barbarella, 5th April 2016 at 18:32.
Reply With Quote
Originally posted by Divine Feminine
:interview:
Bookmarks