Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Europe calls for mandatory 'kill switches' on robots

  1. #1
    Administrator Aragorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2015
    Location
    Middle-Earth
    Posts
    20,294
    Thanks
    88,646
    Thanked 81,108 Times in 20,309 Posts

    Thumbs Up Europe calls for mandatory 'kill switches' on robots



    Source: CNN


    Europe is preparing for a robot revolution.

    European lawmakers have proposed that robots be equipped with emergency "kill switches" to prevent them from causing excessive damage. Legislators have also suggested that robots be insured and even be made to pay taxes.

    The proposal on robot governance was approved by the European Parliament's legal affairs committee on Thursday. The issue will now be considered by the European Commission, which is the bloc's top regulator.

    "A growing number of areas of our daily lives are increasingly affected by robotics," said Mady Delvaux, the parliamentarian who authored the proposal. "To ensure that robots are and will remain in the service of humans, we urgently need to create a robust European legal framework."

    Here is what lawmakers have proposed:


    Kill switch

    The proposal calls for a new charter on robotics that would give engineers guidance on how to design ethical and safe machines.

    For example, designers should include "kill switches" so that robots can be turned off in emergencies. They must also make sure that robots can be reprogrammed if their software doesn't work as designed.




    Stop the killer robots

    The proposal states that designers, producers and operators of robots should generally be governed by the "laws of robotics" described by science fiction writer Isaac Asimov.

    Asimov's laws stipulate that a robot must never harm or kill a human and always obey orders from its creator. Robots must protect their own existence -- unless doing so would cause harm to a human.




    Remember: It's just a robot

    The proposal also says that robots should always be identifiable as mechanical creations. That will help prevent humans from developing emotional attachments.

    "You always have to tell people that robot is not a human and a robot will never be a human," said Delvaux. "You must never think that a robot is a human and that he loves you."

    The report cites the example of care robots, saying that people who are physically dependent on them could develop emotional attachments.


    Who's responsible for misbehaving robots?

    The proposal calls for a compulsory insurance scheme -- similar to car insurance -- that would require producers and owners to take out insurance to cover the damage caused by their robots.




    Give robots rights?

    The proposal explores whether sophisticated autonomous robots should be given the status of "electronic persons."

    This designation would apply in situations where robots make autonomous decisions or interact with humans independently.

    It would also saddle robots with certain rights and obligations -- for example, robots would be responsible for any damage they cause.


    Should robots pay tax?

    If advanced robots start replacing human workers in large numbers, the report recommends the European Commission force their owners to pay taxes or contribute to social security.

    EU member states should also consider implementing a universal income to blunt the impact of the job losses.


    Source: CNN
    = DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR =

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Aragorn For This Useful Post:

    DNA (14th January 2017), Dreamtimer (14th January 2017), Elen (13th January 2017), Gio (13th January 2017), heyokah (13th January 2017), modwiz (14th January 2017)

  3. #2
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd May 2015
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    298
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,651 Times in 295 Posts
    This is an expression (or re-expression) of ideas that have been running around indirectly in science fiction and the minds of men (which some argue is the Mind of God), since we're supposed to be a direct expression of Him. This is a reverse of the idea of "Gort", the robot with irrevocable powers from the remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still". As I see it, any idea has its upside, but also its downside. The principle is: Everything in the Universe is for Use; The Use can be good or bad.
    Last edited by Gale Frierson, 13th January 2017 at 13:58. Reason: Further clarification

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gale Frierson For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (13th January 2017), Dreamtimer (14th January 2017), Elen (13th January 2017), modwiz (14th January 2017)

  5. #3
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    Data had an off switch on TNG. Not a kill switch. Lore had to be dismantled because he was dangerous.

    It's been a long time since I read Robots of Dawn. Perhaps it's time for another read.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (14th January 2017), Elen (14th January 2017), modwiz (14th January 2017)

  7. #4
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    21st January 2014
    Posts
    44
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 248 Times in 44 Posts
    I get the kill switch but aren't we a few years away from worrying about autonomous bots calling for rights? Why not wait till they start complaining and really become autonomous.

    Hopefully by that point, we won't have any European lawmakers.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aKnightThatSaysNi For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (14th January 2017), Dreamtimer (15th January 2017), Elen (14th January 2017), modwiz (14th January 2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •